Head Lines
    Headlines
  • Telangana Assembly passes TSRTC merger Bill
  • 'Money Heist'-Inspired Cyber Criminals Arrested For Conning Noida Businessman
  • SC to monitor cases of crime against women in Manipur
  • Veg thali cost surges 28% in July amid soaring food prices
  • IIM Lucknow launches executive programme in AI for Business
  • Govt to open research park at top educational institutions to promote science & tech
  • US to send Ukraine first $200 million of arms freed by $6.2 billion 'error'
  • Reliance Retail says it is set to lead the retail industry in the coming decade
  • Karnataka High Court accepts petition challenging provisions of Real Estate Regulatory Act
  • ‘I’m doing this for Pewdiepie’: MrBeast challenges T-Series, will fight to become YouTuber with maximum subscribers

The National Gallery is to undergo a substantial makeover to celebrate its bicentenary.

Westminster Council has approved plans for the renovations, which the gallery hopes will be complete in time for its 200th anniversary in 2024.

The Grade I listed site will get a new entrance complete with paving, benches and bollards.

The gallery wants the buildings to be more accessible, but some heritage groups opposed the scheme.

Under the plans, the Sainsbury Wing on St Martin Street, which was opened in 1991, will undergo major works and become the gallery's permanent new entrance.

An underground link will be built to connect it with the main building. 

Some of the gallery's Egyptian-style columns will be moved to become part of a new bookshop and landscaping works will be carried out to public spaces such as Jubilee Walk.

New entrances to the research centre and members' rooms will also be built on Trafalgar Square.

'Outstanding heritage significance'

Historic England raised "strong concerns" about the works and said the Sainsbury Wing was "a vital cultural asset" of "outstanding heritage significance".

The group said it believed the plans would cause "harm" to the protected buildings.

But Westminster City Council unanimously approved the proposals on Tuesday and said the level of heritage harm caused would be "less than substantial" and outweighed by the public benefits.

It said the changes would improve accessibility to the buildings and make security checks easier.

The Twentieth Century Society, which campaigns to protect buildings erected after 1914, said it "strongly" disagreed and called for a public inquiry to decide the future of the site.

A spokesperson said: "This is a grade I listed building, and if it was a Victorian or Georgian one, this level of change would not be allowed."

 

comments

No Comments Till Now.

Write Your Story