To evolve a final text, the UN secretariat has created four ‘contact’ groups. Countries participate in all groups, with their members in all negotiating teams. All groups have clear-cut tasks. Group 1 will discuss plastic products and chemicals of concern as used in plastic products, exemptions, plastic product design, supply, and the foundational definitions of terms. Group 2 will discuss emissions and releases, plastic waste management, existing plastic pollution, and what is needed for a just transition. Group 3 is focussed on finance, including the establishment of a financial mechanism, capacity building, technical assistance, and technology transfer, including international cooperation, while Group 4’s talks deal with implementation and compliance, national plans, reporting, and effectiveness, among other issues.
As is typical at such negotiations, despite reaching the halfway point of the talks, none of the contact groups have managed to achieve consensus on even one of the 32 articles that are part of the base text, called a ‘non paper’ in the parlance of UN treaty negotiations.
‘A just transition’
In verbal ‘interventions,’ where countries publicly raise their concerns to the INC Chair, the tenor of India’s submissions are that speed ought not to trump the spirit of consensus, inclusivity, and transparency. While many countries have addressed various proposals in the several contact groups, India has so far restricted itself to formal proposals on finance mechanisms.
While national representatives at these talks are in principle committed to an agreement, many are worried that a treaty on plastic pollution will restrict the production and supply of plastic and polymers, disrupting their economies. On the other end of the spectrum are Pacific island nations such as Tuvalu, Palau, and Fiji, who are demanding ambitious action on restraining both plastic waste and production. They point out that the marine pollution from dumping plastic waste as well as their limited capacity to respond has resulted in existential threats to their countries.
“The progress that we have made is indeed slow. This is also a forum where countries present not only the issues they face but also their frustrations,” UNEP executive director Inger Andersen said at a press conference on Wednesday. “But I have been around long enough – and we have about 21 different treaties – to know that we can reach agreements and consensus rapidly.”